Outcome prioritization and preferences among older adults with cancer starting chemotherapy in a randomized clinical trial.

INTRODUCTION: Older adults with cancer facing competing treatments must prioritize between various outcomes. This study assessed health outcome prioritization among older adults with cancer starting chemotherapy. METHODS: Secondary analysis of a randomized trial addressing vulnerabilities in older adults with cancer. Patients completed three validated outcome prioritization tools: 1) Health Outcomes Tool: prioritizes outcomes (survival, independence, symptoms) using a visual analog scale; 2) Now vs. Later Tool: rates the importance of quality of life at three times-today versus 1 or 5 years in the future; and 3) Attitude Scale: rates agreement with outcome-related statements. The authors measured the proportion of patients prioritizing various outcomes and evaluated their characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 219 patients (median [range] age 71 [65-88], 68% with metastatic disease) were included. On the Health Outcomes Tool, 60.7% prioritized survival over other outcomes. Having localized disease was associated with choosing survival as top priority. On the Now vs. Later Tool, 50% gave equal importance to current versus future quality of life. On the Attitude Scale, 53.4% disagreed with the statement "the most important thing to me is living as long as I can, no matter what my quality of life is"; and 82.2% agreed with the statement "it is more important to me to maintain my thinking ability than to live as long as possible". CONCLUSION: Although survival was the top priority for most participants, some older individuals with cancer prioritize other outcomes, such as cognition and function. Clinicians should elicit patient-defined priorities and include them in decision-making.

Adjuvant Chemoradiation in Resected Biliary Adenocarcinoma: Evaluation of SWOG S0809 with a Large National Database.

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of evidence supporting the use of adjuvant radiation therapy in resected biliary cancer. Supporting evidence for use comes mainly from the small SWOG S0809 trial, which demonstrated an overall median survival of 35 months. We aimed to use a large national database to evaluate the use of adjuvant chemoradiation in resected extrahepatic bile duct and gallbladder cancer. METHODS: Using the National Cancer Database, we selected patients from 2004 to 2017 with pT2-4, pN0-1, M0 extrahepatic bile duct or gallbladder adenocarcinoma with either R0 or R1 resection margins, and examined factors associated with overall survival (OS). We examined OS in a cohort of patients mimicking the SWOG S0809 protocol as a large validation cohort. Lastly, we compared patients who received chemotherapy only with patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation using entropy balancing propensity score matching. RESULTS: Overall, 4997 patients with gallbladder or extrahepatic bile duct adenocarcinoma with available survival information meeting the SWOG S0809 criteria were selected, 469 of whom received both adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Median OS in patients undergoing chemoradiation was 36.9 months, and was not different between primary sites (p = 0.841). In a propensity score matched cohort, receipt of adjuvant chemoradiation had a survival benefit compared with adjuvant chemotherapy only (hazard ratio 0.86, 95% confidence interval 0.77-0.95; p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: Using a large national database, we support the findings of SWOG S0809 with a similar median OS in patients receiving chemoradiation. These data further support the consideration of adjuvant multimodal therapy in resected biliary cancers.

Acute cancer-related symptoms and concerns among patients receiving chemotherapy: current state of the science.

PURPOSE: This study provides an updated evaluation of the prevalence and severity of acute cancer-related symptoms and quality of life (QOL) concerns among patients treated with emetogenic chemotherapy. METHODS: Patients were recruited to a larger, multi-site observational study prior to starting chemotherapy. Participants completed sociodemographic questionnaires and clinical data were abstracted via medical record review. Symptoms and QOL were assessed 5 days after starting moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy. Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General assessed QOL concerns. Patient Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events evaluated symptoms. Symptoms were considered severe when participants responded "severe" or "very severe." RESULTS: Participants (N = 1174) were on average 58 ± 13 years, mostly female (73%), non-Hispanic (89%), and White (87%). Most participants were diagnosed with breast (38.1%), gynecological (20%), and gastrointestinal (17.1%) cancer. The most common QOL concerns of any severity were fatigue (94%), anhedonia (89%), dissatisfaction with QOL (86%), and sleep disturbance (86%). The most common severe QOL concerns were anhedonia (44%), fatigue (40%), and inability to work (38%). Decreased appetite (74%), pain (71%), and constipation (70%) were the most common symptoms of any severity, as well as most common severe symptoms (13%, 18%, and 18%, respectively). CONCLUSION: Herein, updates are provided in regard to QOL concerns and symptoms reported by patients in the days after chemotherapy and demonstrates that concerns and symptoms have shifted in the last decade.

Cabozantinib plus atezolizumab in previously untreated advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and previously treated gastric cancer and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: results from two expansion cohorts of a multicentre, open-label, phase 1b trial (COSMIC-021).

Background: Cabozantinib is approved for previously treated advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC) and has been investigated in gastric cancer (GC) and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GEJ). Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab is approved for unresectable or metastatic HCC untreated with prior systemic therapy. We evaluated efficacy and safety of cabozantinib plus atezolizumab in aHCC previously untreated with systemic anticancer therapy or previously treated GC/GEJ. Methods: COSMIC-021 (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03170960) is an open-label, phase 1b study in solid tumours with a dose-escalation stage followed by tumour-specific expansion cohorts, including aHCC (cohort 14) and GC/GEJ (cohort 15). Eligible patients were aged ≥18 years with measurable locally advanced, metastatic, or recurrent disease per RECIST version 1.1. Patients received oral cabozantinib 40 mg daily and intravenous atezolizumab 1200 mg once every 3 weeks until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed objective response rate per RECIST version 1.1. Findings: Patients were screened between February 14, 2019, and May 7, 2020, and 61 (30 aHCC, 31 GC/GEJ) were enrolled and received at least one dose of study treatment. Median duration of follow-up was 31.2 months (IQR 28.5-32.7) for aHCC and 30.4 months (28.7-31.9) for GC/GEJ. Objective response rate was 13% (4/30, 95% CI 4-31) for aHCC and 0% (95% CI 0-11) for GC/GEJ. Six (20%) aHCC patients and three (10%) GC/GEJ patients had treatment-related adverse events resulting in discontinuation of either study drug. Interpretation: Cabozantinib plus atezolizumab had clinical activity with a manageable safety profile in aHCC previously untreated with systemic anticancer therapy. Clinical activity of cabozantinib plus atezolizumab was minimal in previously treated GC/GEJ. Funding: Exelixis, Inc., Alameda, CA, USA.

Real-world clinical effectiveness of sorafenib among patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma at two centers in the United States.

BACKGROUND: In the United States, sorafenib monotherapy was approved in 2007 for first-line (1L) treatment of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). As other therapies have been approved in recent years for hepatocellular carcinoma treatment in later lines, it is essential to assess clinical effectiveness of older therapies in actual clinical practice to inform healthcare practitioners' decisions for better patient care. AIM: To assess patient characteristics/clinical effectiveness of 1L sorafenib in uHCC patients treated in United States academic and community practice settings. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was conducted among adult patients (≥ 18 years) in the United States initiating sorafenib monotherapy as 1L systemic therapy for uHCC with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status of 0 or 1 between January 2016 and December 2019 at City of Hope and Advent Health. Data were extracted by trained abstractionists from individual patients' electronic health records and captured in electronic case report forms. Institutional Review Board approvals were obtained prior to study initiation. Data were captured from the time of sorafenib initiation until death or the end of follow-up. All data were de-identified prior to analyses. Clinical outcomes assessed included provider-reported best response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). PFS and OS were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods. RESULTS: Among 134 uHCC patients treated with 1L sorafenib, majority were male (75%), and most were Caucasian (62%) or Asian (19%). Median patient age was 64 years. The most common etiologies of liver disease were hepatitis C (54%), alcohol-related liver disease (16%), and hepatitis B (11%). Most patients were reported to have Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage B (19%) or stage C (70%) disease. Of 134 patients, 110 (82%) were reported to have discontinued treatment or died during follow-up. Primary reasons for sorafenib discontinuation were reported as progression (35%) and toxicity (30%). Best overall response was reported for 124 patients, of which 7.3% reported complete or partial response. Median time to treatment discontinuation was 2.3 mo. Overall, 103 patients (77%) had disease progression or died during sorafenib therapy. Median PFS was estimated to be 2.9 mo. At the end of follow-up, 82 patients (61%) were deceased. Median OS was 8.5 mo. CONCLUSION: Newer therapeutic options that have reported higher PFS and OS in real-world clinical practice should be considered to enhance patient outcomes.

Defining MRI Superiority over CT for Colorectal and Neuroendocrine Liver Metastases.

BACKGROUND: We compared CT and MRI for staging metastatic colorectal or neuroendocrine liver metastases (CRLMs and NELMs, respectively) to assess their impact on tumor burden. METHODS: A prospectively maintained database was queried for patients who underwent both imaging modalities within 3 months, with two blinded radiologists (R1 and R2) independently assessing the images for liver lesions. To minimize recall bias, studies were grouped by modality, and were randomized and evaluated separately. RESULTS: Our query yielded 76 patients (42 CRLMs; 34 NELMs) with low interrater variability (intraclass correlation coefficients: CT = 0.941, MRI = 0.975). For CRLMs, there were no significant differences in lesion number or size between CT and MRI. However, in NELMs, Eovist®-enhanced MRI detected more lesions (R1: 14.3 vs. 12.1, p = 0.02; R2: 14.4 vs. 12.4, p = 0.01) and smaller lesions (R1: 5.7 vs. 4.4, p = 0.03; R2: 4.8 vs. 2.9, p = 0.02) than CT. CONCLUSIONS: CT and MRI are equivalent for CRLMs, but for NELMs, MRI outperforms CT in detecting more and smaller lesions, potentially influencing treatment planning and surgery.

FGFR Inhibition: Understanding and Overcoming Resistance.

SUMMARY: Facchinetti and colleagues provide key insights into the evolution of resistance to fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitors, including the development of kinase domain mutations and activation of the PI3K-AKT signaling axis. In a separate study, Subbiah and colleagues report extensive preclinical data and initial clinical data for RLY-4008, an FGFR2-selective inhibitor that is poised to minimize toxicity and overcome resistance through greater potency and selectivity. See related article by Facchinetti et al., p. 1998 (5). See related article by Subbiah et al., p. 2012 (7).

Adjuvant and Neoadjuvant Treatments for Resectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review provides an update on the developments of adjuvant and neoadjuvant liver-directed and systemic therapy options for patients with resectable hepatocellular carcinoma. RECENT FINDINGS: Data on liver-directed treatment in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings are sparse and results are conflicting; many studies suggest that optimizing patient selection criteria is a key milestone required to improve study design and clinical benefit to patients. Systemic treatment options are primarily focused on investigation of anti-PD-1/L1 immunotherapeutic agents, either alone or in combination with other drugs. Numerous clinical trials in both adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings are in progress. Exploration of liver-directed and systemic treatment options for adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatment of patients with resectable hepatocellular carcinoma has the potential to improve clinical outcomes for this patient population.

A dose escalation/expansion study evaluating dose, safety, and efficacy of the novel tyrosine kinase inhibitor surufatinib, which inhibits VEGFR 1, 2, & 3, FGFR 1, and CSF1R, in US patients with neuroendocrine tumors.

Surufatinib, is a potent inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors 1-3; fibroblast growth factor receptor-1; colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor. This Phase 1/1b escalation/expansion study in US patients with solid tumors evaluated 5 once daily (QD) surufatinib doses (3 + 3 design) to identify maximum tolerated dose (MTD), recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D), and evaluate safety and efficacy at the RP2D in 4 disease-specific expansion cohorts including pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors [pNET] and extrapancreatic NETs [epNET]. MTD and RP2D were 300 mg QD (escalation [n = 35]); 5 patients (15.6%) (Dose Limiting Toxicity [DLT] Evaluable Set [n = 32]) had DLTs. Pharmacokinetics were dose proportional. Estimated progression-free survival (PFS) rates at 11 months were 57.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 28.7, 78.2) and 51.1% (95% CI: 12.8, 80.3) for pNET and epNET expansion cohorts, respectively. Median PFS was 15.2 (95% CI: 5.2, not evaluable) and 11.5 (95% CI: 6.5,11.5) months. Response rates were 18.8% and 6.3%. The most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events (both cohorts) were fatigue (46.9%), hypertension (43.8%), proteinuria (37.5%), diarrhea (34.4%). Pharmacokinetics, safety, and antitumor efficacy of 300 mg QD oral surufatinib in US patients with pNETs and epNETs are consistent with previously reported studies in China and may support applicability of earlier surufatinib studies in US patients. Clinical trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02549937.

The GIANT trial (ECOG-ACRIN EA2186) methods paper: A randomized phase II study of gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel compared with 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and liposomal irinotecan in older patients with treatment-naïve metastatic pancreatic cancer - defining a new treatment option for older vulnerable patients.

INTRODUCTION: Pancreatic cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death in the US with an increasing incidence in older adults (OA) over age 70. There are currently no treatment guidelines for OA with metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPCA) and selecting a chemotherapy regimen for these patients is subjective, based largely on chronologic age and performance status (PS). Geriatric screening tools provide a more objective and accurate evaluation of a patient's overall health but have not yet been validated in patient selection for mPCA treatment. This study aims to elucidate the optimal chemotherapy treatment of vulnerable OA with mPCA and understand the geriatric factors that affect outcomes in this population. METHODS/DESIGN: The GIANT (ECOG-ACRIN EA2186) study is multicenter, randomized phase II trial enrolling patients over age 70 with newly diagnosed mPCA. This study utilizes a screening geriatric assessment (GA) which characterizes patients as fit, vulnerable, or frail. Patients with mild abnormalities in functional status and/or cognition, moderate comorbidities, or over age 80 are considered vulnerable. Enrolled patients are randomized to one of two dose-reduced treatment regimens (gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel every other week, or dose-reduced 5-fluoruracil (5FU)/ liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) every other week). GA and quality of life (QoL) evaluations are completed prior to treatment initiation and at each disease evaluation. Overall survival (OS) is the primary endpoint, with secondary endpoints including progression free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR). Enrolled patients will be stratified by age (70-74 vs ≥75) and ECOG PS (0-1 vs 2). Additional endpoints of interest for OA include evaluation of risk factors identified through GA, QoL evaluation, and toxicities of interest for older adults. Correlative studies include assessment of pro-inflammatory biomarkers of aging in the blood (IL-6, CRP) and imaging evaluation of sarcopenia as predictors of treatment tolerance. DISCUSSION: The GIANT study is the first randomized, prospective national trial evaluating vulnerable OA with mPCA aimed at developing a tailored treatment approach for this patient population. This trial has the potential to establish a new way of objectively selecting vulnerable OA with mPCA for modified treatment and to establish a new standard of care in this growing patient population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered with ClinicalTrial.gov Identifier NCT04233866.

Patient Preferences for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatments: A Discrete-Choice Experiment.

Treatments for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have varying benefit-risk profiles. We elicited 200 US patients' preferences for attributes associated with various first-line systemic treatments for unresectable HCC in a discrete-choice experiment (DCE) survey. Respondents answered nine DCE questions, each offering a choice between two hypothetical treatment profiles defined by six attributes with varying levels: overall survival (OS), months of maintained daily function, severity of palmar-plantar syndrome, severity of hypertension, risk of digestive-tract bleeding, and mode and frequency of administration. A random-parameters logit model was used to analyze the preference data. Patients regarded an additional 10 months of maintaining daily function without decline to be as important or more important than 10 additional months of OS, on average. Respondents valued avoiding moderate-to-severe palmar-plantar syndrome and hypertension more than extended OS. A respondent would require >10 additional months of OS (the greatest increase presented in the study) on average to offset the increased burden of adverse events. Patients with unresectable HCC prioritize avoiding adverse events that would severely impact their quality of life over mode and frequency of administration or digestive-tract bleeding risk. For some patients with unresectable HCC, maintaining daily functioning is as important or more important than the survival benefit of a treatment.

Proposed Implementation of a Patient-Centered Self-Assessment Tool for Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors among Academic and Community Practice Sites: The City of Hope Model.

Neuroendocrine tumors are a rare type of cancer found in hormone-producing cells throughout the body. Research on disease-specific patient education assessments in this population is lacking. We previously demonstrated the feasibility and validity of NET VITALS, a patient-centered self-assessment designed to improve patients' knowledge of their neuroendocrine tumor diagnosis/treatment and facilitate communication with their physician. In this report, we provide a brief overview of patient assessments that have been used for patients with neuroendocrine tumors. We summarize NET VITALS and present a proposed infrastructure for its implementation into standard clinical care in both academic and community practice settings at City of Hope. Incorporating NET VITALS into standard of care treatment for patients with neuroendocrine tumors may improve patients' overall clinical care experience.

Patient-Defined Goals and Preferences Among Adults With Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors.

BACKGROUND: Patient preferences (quantity vs quality of life; present vs future health) have not been investigated in patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). The goal of this cross-sectional study was to evaluate patient values toward treatment goals and competing health outcomes among adults with NETs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with well-differentiated, grade 1 or 2, advanced NETs starting a new systemic therapy completed 4 tools: (1) Health Outcomes Tool, which ranks the importance of 4 outcomes (survival, function/independence, freedom from pain, freedom from symptoms); (2) Attitude Scale, which identifies the extent to which patients agree with statements related to health outcomes; (3) Now versus Later Tool, which ranks the relative importance of quality of life (QoL) now versus 1 and 5 years from now; and (4) Prognosis and Treatment Perceptions Questionnaire, which identifies the amount of information the patient prefers to receive about their disease and treatment, the patient's treatment goal, the patient's perception of the physician's treatment goal, and self-reported health status. RESULTS: We recruited 60 patients with NETs (50.0% aged ≥65 years; 96.7% with stage IV disease). Primary tumor locations included the gastrointestinal tract (41.7%), pancreas (30.0%), and lung (21.7%). A plurality of patients reported maintaining independence as their most important health outcome (46.7%), followed by survival (30.0%), freedom from pain (11.7%), and freedom from symptoms (11.7%). A total of 67% of patients agreed with the statement, "I would rather live a shorter life than lose my ability to take care of myself"; 85.0% agreed with the statement, "It is more important to me to maintain my thinking ability than to live as long as possible." When asked to choose between current QoL versus QoL 1 year or 5 years in the future as more important, 48.3% and 40.0% of patients valued their QoL 1 year and 5 years in the future, respectively, more than their current QoL. Only 51.7% of patients believed their physician's treatment goals aligned with their own. CONCLUSIONS: Adult patients with NETs strongly value independence over survival. More communication between patients with NETs and their physicians is needed to ensure that patient preferences are incorporated into treatment plans.

Diet quality indices and changes in cognition during chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: No evidence-based prevention strategies currently exist for cancer-related cognitive decline (CRCD). Although patients are often advised to engage in healthy lifestyle activities (e.g., nutritious diet), little is known about the impact of diet on preventing CRCD. This secondary analysis evaluated the association of pre-treatment diet quality indices on change in self-reported cognition during chemotherapy. METHODS: Study participants (n = 96) completed the Block Brief Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ) before receiving their first infusion and the PROMIS cognitive function and cognitive abilities questionnaires before infusion and again 5 days later (i.e., when symptoms were expected to be their worst). Diet quality indices included the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH), Alternate Mediterranean Diet (aMED), and a low carbohydrate diet index and their components. Descriptive statistics were generated for demographic and clinical variables and diet indices. Residualized change models were computed to examine whether diet was associated with change in cognitive function and cognitive abilities, controlling for age, sex, cancer type, treatment type, depression, and fatigue. RESULTS: Study participants had a mean age of 59 ± 10.8 years and 69% were female. Although total diet index scores did not predict change in cognitive function or cognitive abilities, higher pre-treatment ratio of aMED monounsaturated/saturated fat was associated with less decline in cognitive function and cognitive abilities at 5-day post-infusion (P ≤ .001). CONCLUSIONS: Higher pre-treatment ratio of monounsaturated/saturated fat intake was associated with less CRCD early in chemotherapy. Results suggest greater monounsaturated fat and less saturated fat intake could be protective against CRCD during chemotherapy.

Treatment Sequencing Strategies in Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Review.

Neuroendocrine tumor (NET) incidence has grown. The treatment landscape for advanced NETs is rapidly evolving, but there are limited head-to-head data to guide treatment sequencing decisions. We assessed the available clinical data to aid practicing clinicians in their routine clinical decision-making. Clinical trials have demonstrated efficacy benefits for new therapies in advanced NETs. Emerging long-term data from these trials have enabled clinicians to make more accurate risk-benefit assessments, particularly for patients receiving multiple lines of therapy. However, clinical data specifically regarding treatment sequencing are limited. In lieu of definitive data, treatment sequencing should be based on disease-related factors (e.g., site of tumor origin, volume of disease) and patient-related characteristics (e.g., comorbidities, patient preferences). Clinical decision-making in advanced NETs remains highly individualized and complex; important evidence gaps regarding treatment sequencing remain. Given this, advanced NET management should be a joint effort of multidisciplinary teams at referring and high-volume centers. Additional clinical trial and real-world evidence are needed to meet the challenge of understanding how to sequence available NET therapies. Until these trials are conducted, the best practices provided in this review may serve as a guide for clinicians making treatment sequencing decisions based on the available data.

Real-World Clinical and Patient-Reported Outcomes from the Longitudinal Telotristat Ethyl Treatment Registry of Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Background: Telotristat ethyl (TE) is an oral tryptophan hydroxylase inhibitor approved for the treatment of carcinoid syndrome diarrhea (CSD) in combination with somatostatin analogs (SSAs). Methods: This prospective, observational, single-arm study evaluated long-term patient-reported outcomes for adults initiating TE in US clinical practice from 2017 through January 2022. The primary objective was satisfaction with overall CS symptom control 6 months after initiating TE. Secondary objectives evaluated satisfaction with control of CSD, flushing, and CS symptoms, as well as work productivity/activity impairment, SSA use, and weight. All analyses were descriptive in nature. Results: A total of 223 patients completed the baseline survey; 56% also completed the 6-month follow-up survey. Mean age was 61 years and 61% were women. After 6 months of TE treatment, the majority of patients (76%, n=95/125) reported being satisfied with control of their CS symptoms which was markedly improved from baseline (41%, n=91). Similarly, the majority of patients (78%, n=97/125) were satisfied with control of their CSD after 6 months of TE, markedly improved from baseline (36%). Conclusion: This longitudinal observational study showed improvements in real-world clinical and humanistic outcomes for patients with CS and at least 6 months of TE treatment.

Biomarker analysis from a phase II multi-institutional study of nivolumab in patients with advanced refractory biliary tract cancer.

BACKGROUND: Our previous phase II study demonstrated that nivolumab provides modest but durable clinical efficacy in patients with refractory biliary tract cancer, suggesting the significant clinical benefit of nivolumab in selected patients and the necessity of predictive biomarkers. We evaluated clinicopathological characteristics and tumour microenvironment of the patients who were enrolled the trial to identify potential biomarkers. METHODS: Baseline clinicopathological characteristics and pretreatment tumour samples were collected. The obtained tumour samples were assessed for whole exome sequencing, RNA sequencing and immunohistochemistry. Their correlations with clinical outcome were analysed. RESULTS: Pretreatment tumour evaluation revealed PD-L1 expression on tumour, CD8 T cell infiltration and high ratio of CD8 T cell/regulatory T cell in tumour microenvironment were significantly associated with prolonged progression-free survival (PFS), while PD-1 expression on lymphocytes and CD68 macrophages infiltration in tumour microenvironment had no predictive role. Asian patients (N = 3) had improved PFS and disease control rate compared with non-Asian (N = 54). A six-gene predictive model was constructed by evaluation of total 23,550 candidate genes from RNA sequencing of baseline tumour samples using LASSO-Cox regression analysis, and high score of the six-gene prediction model was associated with prolonged PFS. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that PD-L1 expression on tumour, CD8 T cell infiltration and high ratio of CD8/regulatory T cells and six-gene expression profile in tumour microenvironment may be potential predictive biomarkers of nivolumab in biliary tract cancers. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Phase II Study Combining Pembrolizumab with Aromatase Inhibitor in Patients with Metastatic Hormone Receptor Positive Breast Cancer.

This study investigated the safety and antitumor activity of aromatase inhibitors (AI) with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) pembrolizumab in patients with hormone receptor positive (HR+) human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in a phase II study with a safety lead-in (NCT02648477). Patients received pembrolizumab plus AI up to 2 years or until confirmed progression or unacceptable toxicity. Key eligibility criteria were HR+ HER2- MBC; RECIST v1.1 measurable disease; adequate organ function; and ECOG 0-1. Primary endpoints were safety and overall response rate. A 3-at-risk design was used for the safety lead-in with a targeted accrual of 20 patients. Grade 2 adverse events (AEs) included 35% fatigue, 20% rash, and 10% hot flashes. Grade 3 immune-related AEs (irAEs) related to pembrolizumab included 5% elevated AST/ALT, 5% rash, and 5% lymphopenia. Two (10%) patients had partial responses, three (15%) had stable disease, and 15 (75%) had progression of disease. Median progression-free survival was 1.8 months (95% CI 1.6, 2.6), median overall survival was 17.2 months (95% CI 9.4, NA), and median follow-up time was 40.1 months (range 31.3-46.8 months). The combination was well tolerated, but clinical activity was comparable to AI alone.

An Expert, Multidisciplinary Perspective on Best Practices in Biomarker Testing in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is a rare and aggressive malignancy that arises from the intrahepatic biliary tree and is associated with a poor prognosis. Until recently, the treatment landscape of advanced/metastatic iCCA has been limited primarily to chemotherapy. In recent years, the advent of biomarker testing has identified actionable genetic alterations in 40%-50% of patients with iCCA, heralding an era of precision medicine for these patients. Biomarker testing using next-generation sequencing (NGS) has since become increasingly relevant in iCCA; however, several challenges and gaps in standard image-guided liver biopsy and processing have been identified. These include variability in tissue acquisition relating to the imaging modality used for biopsy guidance, the biopsy method used, number of passes, needle choice, specimen preparation methods, the desmoplastic nature of the tumor, as well as the lack of communication among the multidisciplinary team. Recognizing these challenges and the lack of evidence-based guidelines for biomarker testing in iCCA, a multidisciplinary team of experts including interventional oncologists, a gastroenterologist, medical oncologists, and pathologists suggest best practices for optimizing tissue collection and biomarker testing in iCCA.